Nick Rolfe
1a41e5519a
Merge pull request #2141 from github/nickrolfe/deprecate-ff
...
Deprecate fine-grained parallelism feature-flag
2024-02-14 17:56:51 +00:00
Nick Rolfe
f00392ec30
Deprecate fine-grained parallelism feature-flag
2024-02-14 17:21:01 +00:00
Nick Rolfe
df32e39913
Merge pull request #1975 from github/nickrolfe/vscode-formatter
...
VSCode settings: set default formatter for TS
2023-10-30 10:49:04 +00:00
Nick Rolfe
88d03c647b
VSCode settings: set default formatter for TS
...
Tell VSCode to format code with Prettier, since that's the same tool we
use to check the format with `npm run lint`.
2023-10-27 17:21:58 +01:00
Nick Rolfe
4888104fe9
Merge pull request #1940 from github/nickrolfe/rename_fgp_flag
...
Rename feature flag for evaluator fine-grained parallelism
2023-10-26 12:34:26 +01:00
Nick Rolfe
06d8f4f7f8
Rename feature flag for evaluator fine-grained parallelism
2023-10-26 11:45:37 +01:00
Nick Rolfe
3078f51bf0
Merge pull request #1900 from github/nickrolfe/fine-grained-version
...
Bump min. version for evaluator parallelism feature flag
2023-09-22 17:44:44 +01:00
Nick Rolfe
724d64319a
Bump min. version for evaluator parallelism feature flag
...
Since we suspect fine-grained parallelism may make the OOM issues worse,
we don't want to enable it on 2.14.0-2.14.5, even though they support
it.
2023-09-22 14:43:03 +01:00
Nick Rolfe
a6b0ced86b
Merge pull request #1818 from github/nickrolfe/disable-intra-layer-parallelism
...
Pass explicit option to disable intra-layer parallelism
2023-07-31 12:15:52 +01:00
Nick Rolfe
c7b7456c9e
Pass explicit option to disable intra-layer parallelism
2023-07-31 11:47:25 +01:00
Nick Rolfe
cf445f7cf3
Merge pull request #1817 from github/nickrolfe/evaluator-intra-layer-parallelism-ff
...
Use feature flag to enable evaluator intra-layer parallelism
2023-07-31 11:03:26 +01:00
Nick Rolfe
2f8540dd31
Add CHANGELOG entry for intra-layer parallelism rollout
2023-07-31 10:08:17 +01:00
Nick Rolfe
bc068d74aa
Use feature flag to enable evaluator intra-layer parallelism
2023-07-31 09:44:35 +01:00
Nick Rolfe
6a07b2ad43
Merge pull request #1760 from github/nickrolfe/scaling-memory
...
Respect `scaling_reserved_ram` feature flag
2023-07-10 10:25:38 +01:00
Nick Rolfe
ab9aa50acb
Add integration test for scaling_reserved_ram feature flag
2023-07-07 17:01:34 +01:00
Nick Rolfe
28e070c442
Add changenote for scaling_reserved_ram change
2023-07-07 16:46:48 +01:00
Nick Rolfe
f232722edf
Respect scaling_reserved_ram feature flag
...
The amount of RAM given to the CodeQL evaluator is the machine's total
memory size, minus a reserved amount. Currently, the reserved amount is
fixed at 1 GB (or 1.5 GB on Windows). When the scaling_reserved_ram
feature flag is enabled, we also add 2% of the total memory size to the
reserved amount. This allows for the fact that the kernel will consume
more RAM (e.g. for page tables) on machines with more physical RAM.
2023-07-07 16:46:47 +01:00
Nick Rolfe
df0c306daf
Update warning about interpreted languages to mention Ruby
2022-01-14 11:57:29 +00:00
Nick Rolfe
852d99d8e2
Call codeql.exe rather than codeql.cmd wrapper on Windows
2020-06-23 15:25:45 +01:00
Nick Rolfe